Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed18 April 20233291411

9 Waterford Common, Waterford, HERTFORD, SG14 2QD

demolition of annexe and single storey rear extension. Erection of a two storey rear extension incorporating Juliet balconies. Alterations to roof to include replacement of dormer windows to front. Creation of canopy to front. External alterations to windows and doors and removal of chimney

Authority
East Hertfordshire District Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Savage K

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal amounts to inappropriate development in the Green Belt
  • The effect on the openness of the Green Belt and the purposes of including land within it
  • If the development is inappropriate, whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify it

What decided it

The offsetting effect of the annexe building removal, combined with past acceptance of the existing scale of extensions and the absence of material harm to Green Belt openness, clearly outweighed the harm from inappropriateness and established very special circumstances.

Framework references: 149

Plan policies cited: Policy GBR1

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.