Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed23 March 20233291687

1 Bridge Place, Bournemouth, BH10 7EA

Planning appeal 3291687 at 1 Bridge Place, Bournemouth, BH10 7EA (Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole) was dismissed on 23 March 2023 by Inspector Davies N, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Appeal A: (a) The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area; (b) The effect of the development on the living conditions of the occupants of adjacent dwellings, with regard to light and outlook; (c) Whether the dwelling would provide suitable living conditions for future occupants; (d) The impact of the development on the integrity of the Dorset Heathlands Special Protection Area (the SPA) and the Dorset Heaths Special Area of Conservation (the SAC); (e) The effect of the development on protected species; (f) Whether occupants of the dwelling would be safe from flooding; (g) Whether the submitted drawings provide an accurate basis on which to assess the effect of the development.

erection of a 2 bed house, using the existing parking and drive access for both the proposal and the parent property

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Davies N
Postcode
BH10 7EA

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Appeal A: (a) The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area; (b) The effect of the development on the living conditions of the occupants of adjacent dwellings, with regard to light and outlook; (c) Whether the dwelling would provide suitable living conditions for future occupants; (d) The impact of the development on the integrity of the Dorset Heathlands Special Protection Area (the SPA) and the Dorset Heaths Special Area of Conservation (the SAC); (e) The effect of the development on protected species; (f) Whether occupants of the dwelling would be safe from flooding; (g) Whether the submitted drawings provide an accurate basis on which to assess the effect of the development.
  • Appeal B: (a) The effect that varying the condition would have on the character and appearance of the area; (b) The living conditions of the occupants of 1 Bridge Place; (c) The integrity of the SPA and the SAC.

What decided it

The failure to secure planning obligations to mitigate impacts on the Dorset Heathlands SPA and SAC, combined with the significant harm to character and appearance and living conditions of neighbours and future occupants, meant the proposals conflicted with the development plan and could not be justified.

The modest benefits of providing one additional dwelling and supporting housing supply were outweighed by the significant harm to character and appearance, living conditions of neighbours and future occupants, and the inability to safely conclude that the integrity of the SPA and SAC would be protected; the tilted balance did not apply due to the likely significant effect on the habitats site.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy CS6Policy CS21Policy CS30Policy CS33Policy CS41Policy 6.8
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 12Paragraph 60Paragraph 69Paragraph 74Paragraph 182

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

93 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Bournemouth Christchurch and Poole

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023

  1. Dismissed28 October 20266010210
    Parkside Guesthouse, 24 Southcote Road, Bournemouth, BH1 3SR
  2. Allowed22 October 20266013051
    16 Riverside Lane, Bournemouth, BH6 3LD
  3. Dismissed19 October 20266005901
    Flat 5, 11 Alyth Road Talbot Woods, Bournemouth, BH3 7DF
  4. Dismissed15 October 20266006741
    6 Park Place, Poole, BH14 0LY
  5. Dismissed14 October 20266011383
    41 Shillito Road, Poole, BH12 2BW

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.