Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed16 September 20223291957

95 High Street, STEYNING, BN44 3RE

the erection of an entrance porch at the rear of the property

Authority
Horsham District Council
Appeal type
other · Listed Building Consent & Conservation Area Consent Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Bristow T

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether or not the proposal would preserve or enhance the Listed Building, any features of special architectural interest which it possesses, and the character or appearance of the Steyning Conservation Area

What decided it

The loss of historic fabric combined with the visual discord of the porch design with the building's simple vernacular form, which would undermine historic coherence, could not be justified by the public benefits claimed, which were largely matters of personal preference rather than clear necessity.

Framework references: 189, 199, 200, 202

Plan policies cited: HDPF policy 34, SNDP3

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.