Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed12 October 20266011680

Land at High Chaparral, London Road, Washington, RH20 3BP

Planning appeal 6011680 at Land at High Chaparral, London Road, Washington, RH20 3BP (Horsham District Council) was allowed on 12 October 2026, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the site is suitable for residential development, having regard to its location, the proposed land use and the amount of development.

permission in principle for the construction of 4no. two -storey dwellings

Appeal type
minor · Planning
Procedure
Written
Development
residential
Postcode
RH20 3BP

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the site is suitable for residential development, having regard to its location, the proposed land use and the amount of development

What decided it

The substantial weight the Framework gives to the provision of new housing, combined with the absence of significant harm to the character of the countryside or sustainable patterns of movement, outweighed the conflict with the development plan and the requirement for physical relationship to a settlement.

The substantial weight the Framework gives to the provision of new housing outweighs the adverse effect of the proposal, notwithstanding the conflict with the development plan and the absence of physical well-relatedness to an existing settlement

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
HDPF Policy 1HDPF Policy 2HDPF Policy 3HDPF Policy 4HDPF Policy 26Storrington, Sullington and Washington Neighbourhood Plan Policy 1
National Planning Policy Framework
Policy S3Policy S5Policy S6

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

35 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Horsham District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Allowed29 October 20266008830
    Staalcot Farm Stall House Lane, Stall House Lane, North Heath, RH20 2HR
  2. Allowed25 September 20266010268
    Priory Field Barn, Monastery Lane, Storrington, RH20 4LN
  3. Allowed24 September 20266007772
    The Lamb Inn, Lambs Green, Rusper, RH12 4RG
  4. Allowed10 September 20266009593
    Land East of Spring Gardens, Washington, RH20 3BP
  5. Allowed24 August 20266007104
    Land Adjacent to Cedar Cottage, Furners Lane, Henfield, BN5 9HS

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.