Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed7 December 20223291961

Springfield Cottage Ford Road, Bisley, WOKING, GU24 9EL

Construction of ground and first floor extension, insertion of new conservation roof lights, replace existing roof with like for like materials. Removal of modern conservatory and lean to building. Replacement of existing windows with like for like double glazed units

Authority
Surrey Heath Borough Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Sutton A

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the revised National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies.
  • The effect on the openness of the Green Belt.
  • The effect of the proposal on protected species.
  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the property, which is a non-designated heritage asset.
  • Whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal.

What decided it

The substantial harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness and loss of openness was not clearly outweighed by other considerations, and very special circumstances did not exist to justify the proposal.

Framework references: 11, 137, 149, 150, 203, 54

Plan policies cited: Policy CP14A of the Surrey Heath Core Strategy and Development Management Policies, Policy DM9 of the Core Strategy, Policy DM17 of the Core Strategy, Surrey Heath Residential Design Guidance Supplementary Planning Document

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.