Planning appeal decision
Land East of Bay Horse Lane, Bay Horse, Lancaster, Lancashire, LA2 0HR
Planning appeal 3291972 at Land East of Bay Horse Lane, Bay Horse, Lancaster, Lancashire, LA2 0HR (Lancaster City Council) was dismissed on 2 August 2022 by Inspector Taylor K, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the appeal proposal would constitute an acceptable form of development with particular regard to the provisions of local and national policy in respect of the location of development.
erection of one dwelling with associated access
- Authority
- Lancaster City Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Taylor K
- Postcode
- LA2 0HR
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the appeal proposal would constitute an acceptable form of development with particular regard to the provisions of local and national policy in respect of the location of development
- The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
What decided it
The unsustainable location of the site in open countryside remote from services and public transport, combined with harm to character and appearance through loss of an important gap in development, outweighs the limited housing and economic benefits.
The limited benefits of housing supply and economic contribution do not outweigh the policy conflicts and harm to character and appearance; the adverse impacts would significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits even if there were a five-year housing supply shortfall
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy SP1Policy SP2Policy DM4Policy DM60Policy DM29Policy DM46
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 80Paragraph 12Paragraph 15
- Judgments
- Braintree District Council v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government & Ors [2017] EWHC 2743 (Admin)
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Lancaster City Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022
- Dismissed27 October 20266012921Land Off Deer Park Lane, Hornby, Lancaster, LA2 8LF
- Dismissed26 October 20266015073Barn At Grid Reference 350285 458603, Littlefell Lane, Lancaster, LA2 0RF
- Dismissed13 October 20266010136Cromwell Buildings, Rosemary Lane, Lancaster, LA1 1NH
- Dismissed13 October 20266009206Cumberland View Hotel, Heysham Road, Heysham, LA3 1DE
- Dismissed5 October 2026601320324 Hazelwood, Silverdale, LA5 0TQ
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®