Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed6 June 20223292147

31 Holly Park Gardens, LONDON, N3 3NG

a ‘Single storey front and side extension. Part single two storey rear extension. Single storey side and side extension to the rear of existing garage. Roof extension involving rear dormer and side dormer window and six no roof lights. Alterations to existing fenestration and demolition of 1 no chimney. New permeable front drive with crossover. Outbuilding and alterations to landscaping and to rear garden’

Authority
London Borough of Barnet
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Price A

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the host property and the surrounding area, with particular regard to the first-floor rear extension
  • the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of the occupants of 33 Holly Park Gardens, with particular regard to outlook

What decided it

The proposed first-floor rear extension, by virtue of its full width, matching ridge level, and overall scale and massing, would fail to appear as a subordinate addition and would be unsympathetic to the original property's character and appearance, contrary to development plan policies on design quality.

Plan policies cited: Policy D3 of the London Plan (2021), Policy CS1 of the London Borough of Barnet: Local Plan (Core Strategy) DPD (2012), Policy CS5 of the London Borough of Barnet: Local Plan (Core Strategy) DPD (2012), Policy DM01 of the London Borough of Barnet: Local Plan (Development Management Policies) DPD (2012)

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.