Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed5 February 20243292202

Land to the South of Marsworth Road and West of Vicarage Way, Pitstone, Bucks, LU7 9TE

Planning appeal 3292202 at Land to the South of Marsworth Road and West of Vicarage Way, Pitstone, Bucks, LU7 9TE (Buckinghamshire Council - Aylesbury Area *) was dismissed on 5 February 2024 by Inspector Nicholls H, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether or not the proposed location is suitable for housing, with particular regard to national and local policies for housing and community uses.

construction 21no. dwellings (8 flats and 13 houses), including associated works, car parking and landscaping

Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Major dwellings
Inspector
Nicholls H
Postcode
LU7 9TE

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether or not the proposed location is suitable for housing, with particular regard to national and local policies for housing and community uses
  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the local area
  • whether the proposal would include an adequate parking provision
  • whether the proposal would deliver enough adaptable and accessible units to accord with relevant local policies
  • the effects on the living conditions of future and existing neighbouring occupiers, with particular regard to privacy and loss of outlook
  • whether the proposal would accord with local policies concerning its energy efficiency and carbon saving measures
  • whether or not infrastructure is included which is necessary, directly, fairly and reasonably related to support the scheme
  • the effects of the proposal on the SAC

What decided it

The lack of certainty regarding the Suitable Alternative Natural Greenspace mitigation and the absence of a defined SANG project meant the development would result in significant unmitigated effects on the integrity of the Chilterns Beechwoods Special Area of Conservation, which is a protected area under the Framework and provides a clear reason for refusal that disengages the tilted balance.

The significant weight afforded to housing provision (including 8 affordable dwellings) and the modest economic benefits of construction did not outweigh the identified conflict with the development plan arising from unmitigated harm to the Special Area of Conservation, which is protected by policies and footnote 7 of the Framework.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy 2 of the Pitstone Neighbourhood PlanPolicy 1 of the Pitstone Neighbourhood PlanPolicy I3 of the Vale of Aylesbury Local PlanPolicy S1 of the Vale of Aylesbury Local PlanPolicy S2 of the Vale of Aylesbury Local PlanPolicy D3 of the Vale of Aylesbury Local PlanPolicy BE2 of the Vale of Aylesbury Local PlanPolicy 6 of the Pitstone Neighbourhood PlanPolicy T6 of the Vale of Aylesbury Local PlanPolicy H6c of the Vale of Aylesbury Local PlanPolicy BE3 of the Vale of Aylesbury Local PlanPolicy C3 of the Vale of Aylesbury Local PlanPolicy I1 of the Vale of Aylesbury Local PlanPolicy I2 of the Vale of Aylesbury Local PlanPolicy H1 of the Vale of Aylesbury Local PlanPolicy H6a of the Vale of Aylesbury Local PlanPolicy S5 of the Vale of Aylesbury Local PlanPolicy NE1 of the Vale of Aylesbury Local Plan
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11
Judgments
High Court Order Ref CO/1805/2023, dated 30.06.2023

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

23 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Buckinghamshire Council - Aylesbury Area

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Allowed31 March 20263372565
    Land South Of Bourton Road, Buckingham, Buckinghamshire, MK18 7DR
  2. Allowed23 March 20263376163
    Barn at Newfoundland, Ivy Lane, Great Brickhill, Buckinghamshire, MK17 9AH
  3. Allowed12 March 20263374676
    2 Pebblemoor, Edlesborough, Buckinghamshire, LU6 2HZ
  4. Allowed12 March 20263372795
    Land at the Rear of Orchard Cottage Main Street, Grendon Underwood, Aylesbury, HP18 0SJ
  5. Notice upheld23 February 20263349116
    Upper Little London Farm, Wendover, Buckinghamshire, HP22 6QQ

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.