Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed30 September 20223292356

58, Batoum Gardens, London, W6 7QD

Planning appeal 3292356 at 58, Batoum Gardens, London, W6 7QD (London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham) was dismissed on 30 September 2022 by Inspector Chukwujekwu I, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed development upon the appearance of the host dwelling and whether it would conserve or enhance the character of the Melrose Conservation Area.

excavation of an enlarged front light well and installation of a staircase to basement level

Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
other · Householder developments
Inspector
Chukwujekwu I
Postcode
W6 7QD

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development upon the appearance of the host dwelling and whether it would conserve or enhance the character of the Melrose Conservation Area
  • Whether the information provided in support of the appeal is sufficient to justify the proposed development and has shown that flood risk has been adequately dealt with, with particular regard to relevant government advice and local policy

What decided it

The proposal would fail to conserve or enhance the character and appearance of the Melrose Conservation Area and would not adequately demonstrate that flood risk has been minimised, contrary to statutory duties and local and national planning policy.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
DC1DC4DC8DC11CC3CC4
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 56

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

At least 756 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Allowed27 October 20266010878
    47, Mendora Road, London, SW6 7ND
  2. Dismissed1 October 20266010445
    Pavement Outside 498-504 Fulham Road, London, SW6 5NH
  3. Dismissed1 October 20266010443
    Pavement Outside 498-504 Fulham Road, London, SW6 5NH
  4. Allowed23 September 20266010549
    The Triangle, 5 - 17 Hammersmith Grove, London, W6 0LG
  5. Unknown18 September 20263356900
    Unit 1D, Woodstock Studios, 36 Woodstock Grove, London, W12 8LE

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.