Planning appeal decision
58, Batoum Gardens, London, W6 7QD
Planning appeal 3292356 at 58, Batoum Gardens, London, W6 7QD (London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham) was dismissed on 30 September 2022 by Inspector Chukwujekwu I, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed development upon the appearance of the host dwelling and whether it would conserve or enhance the character of the Melrose Conservation Area.
excavation of an enlarged front light well and installation of a staircase to basement level
- Appeal type
- householder · Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- other · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Chukwujekwu I
- Postcode
- W6 7QD
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the proposed development upon the appearance of the host dwelling and whether it would conserve or enhance the character of the Melrose Conservation Area
- Whether the information provided in support of the appeal is sufficient to justify the proposed development and has shown that flood risk has been adequately dealt with, with particular regard to relevant government advice and local policy
What decided it
The proposal would fail to conserve or enhance the character and appearance of the Melrose Conservation Area and would not adequately demonstrate that flood risk has been minimised, contrary to statutory duties and local and national planning policy.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- DC1DC4DC8DC11CC3CC4
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 56
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022
- Allowed27 October 2026601087847, Mendora Road, London, SW6 7ND
- Dismissed1 October 20266010445Pavement Outside 498-504 Fulham Road, London, SW6 5NH
- Dismissed1 October 20266010443Pavement Outside 498-504 Fulham Road, London, SW6 5NH
- Allowed23 September 20266010549The Triangle, 5 - 17 Hammersmith Grove, London, W6 0LG
- Unknown18 September 20263356900Unit 1D, Woodstock Studios, 36 Woodstock Grove, London, W12 8LE
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®