Planning appeal decision
The Warren, Woldingham, CR3 7JH
Planning appeal 3292482 at The Warren, Woldingham, CR3 7JH (Tandridge District Council) was dismissed on 12 April 2023 by Inspector Smith J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, including its effect on openness.
demolition of The Warren and proposed development to deliver nine new dwellinghouses and associated works
- Authority
- Tandridge District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Smith J
- Postcode
- CR3 7JH
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, including its effect on openness
- the effect on the character and appearance of the area
- if the proposal is inappropriate, whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness and harm to openness, to which substantial weight was given, was not clearly outweighed by the moderate benefit of housing delivery and other limited benefits, such that very special circumstances do not exist.
the substantial harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness and moderate harm to openness was not outweighed by the moderate benefit of housing delivery and limited benefits from economic and community contributions, such that very special circumstances do not exist
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- DP10DP13CSP18DP7L1
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 149Paragraph 149dParagraph 149gParagraph 148Paragraph 11Paragraph 11dParagraph 11d(i)Paragraph 11d(ii)
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Tandridge District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023
- Allowed29 October 20266006369Land at Thornhill, Westerham Road, Limpsfield, Oxted, RH8 0ED
- Dismissed14 October 20266008351Development Site West of Southwood, Waller Lane, Caterham, CR3 5EA
- Dismissed13 October 20266007518Rosemary Cottage, Smallfield Road, Horne, Horley, RH6 9JP
- Dismissed23 September 20266008688Land Adjacent to Farm View Cottage, Lingfield Road, East Grinstead, RH19 2JW
- Dismissed22 September 20266011736Land Adjacent to Oaklands Drive, Copthorne Bank, Copthorne, RH10 3JD
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®