Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed31 January 20233292592

46 Pennard Road, LONDON, W12 8DS

the conversion of a single family dwelling into 1 x 3 bedroom self-contained flat, 1 x 2 bedroom self-contained flat and 1 x1 bedroom self-contained flat; erection of a rear roof extension; erection of a single storey extension to the side of the main building and to the side and rear of the existing back addition; alterations to the rear elevation to include the installation of new windows, Juliet balconies and bi-folding doors; installation of new railings to the front boundary wall and installation of a refuse and bike store in the front garden area without complying with conditions attached to planning permission Ref 2017/03503/FUL, dated 3 November 2017

Authority
London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Robbie K

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether or not a mechanism to control parking is necessary to protect the area from parking stress and to limit congestion
  • If so, whether or not the disputed conditions provide such a mechanism

What decided it

Conditions 10 and 12 provide a reasonable mechanism tied to the property itself to secure car-parking permit-free measures required by Local Plan Policy T4, whereas condition 11 impermissibly restricted individuals rather than the land and therefore failed the NPPF tests for conditions.

Plan policies cited: Policy T1, Policy T4, Policy CC10, Policy HO11, Key Principle TR3

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.