Planning appeal decision
46 Pennard Road, LONDON, W12 8DS
the conversion of a single family dwelling into 1 x 3 bedroom self-contained flat, 1 x 2 bedroom self-contained flat and 1 x1 bedroom self-contained flat; erection of a rear roof extension; erection of a single storey extension to the side of the main building and to the side and rear of the existing back addition; alterations to the rear elevation to include the installation of new windows, Juliet balconies and bi-folding doors; installation of new railings to the front boundary wall and installation of a refuse and bike store in the front garden area without complying with conditions attached to planning permission Ref 2017/03503/FUL, dated 3 November 2017
- Authority
- London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Robbie K
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether or not a mechanism to control parking is necessary to protect the area from parking stress and to limit congestion
- If so, whether or not the disputed conditions provide such a mechanism
What decided it
Conditions 10 and 12 provide a reasonable mechanism tied to the property itself to secure car-parking permit-free measures required by Local Plan Policy T4, whereas condition 11 impermissibly restricted individuals rather than the land and therefore failed the NPPF tests for conditions.
Plan policies cited: Policy T1, Policy T4, Policy CC10, Policy HO11, Key Principle TR3
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®