Planning appeal decision
10-24 Lamb Lane, London, E8 3PL
Planning appeal 3292646 at 10-24 Lamb Lane, London, E8 3PL (London Borough of Hackney) was dismissed on 24 October 2023 by Inspector Catchpole R, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the site is an appropriate location for the proposed development having regard to local and national planning policies.
the demolition of an existing building and construction of part six, part seven storey building, with basement, providing 32 residential units (18x1, 12x2 and 2x3 bed units) and 998 sqm of commercial floor over basement and ground floor levels including roof top terrace
- Authority
- London Borough of Hackney
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Catchpole R
- Postcode
- E8 3PL
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the site is an appropriate location for the proposed development having regard to local and national planning policies
- the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the local area, bearing in mind the special attention that should be paid to the desirability of preserving or enhancing the character or appearance of the Mare Street Conservation Area and the setting of the nearby Grade II* listed building, 'The New Lansdowne Club' (Ref: 1265590)
- the effect of the proposal on the living conditions of future occupants with regard to the ventilation of single aspect rooms and nearby residents with regard to daylight
- whether there are any other material considerations, including the housing land supply situation and benefits of the proposal, which would indicate that it should be determined other than in accordance with the development plan
What decided it
The harm to the character and appearance of the townscape and the less than substantial harm to the Mare Street Conservation Area, combined with conflict with the employment land policy LP27, outweighed the public benefits and meant the tilted balance did not apply.
The harm to the Conservation Area and townscape and the conflict with employment policy LP27 were given significant and considerable weight and outweighed the benefits of housing delivery, affordable housing contribution and affordable workspace, tipping the balance against the proposal.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- LP1LP2LP3LP12LP13LP14LP26LP27HC1D6D3(D)(7)H10
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 69Paragraph 125Paragraph 126Paragraph 130Paragraph 199Paragraph 200Paragraph 202
- Judgments
- North Wiltshire DC [1993] 65 P. & C.R. 137
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in London Borough of Hackney
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023
- Dismissed2 October 2026600792747 Burma Road, Hackney, N16 9BH
- Dismissed1 October 20266010033259 Wick Road, Hackney, London, E9 5DG
- Dismissed30 September 20266010111Flat B, 83 Rectory Road, Hackney, N16 7PP
- Dismissed30 September 20266010110Flat B, 83 Rectory Road, Hackney, N16 7PP
- Dismissed25 September 2026601220442 Cranwich Road, Hackney, N16 5JN
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®