Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed24 February 20233292942

2 St Lukes Court, Whyteleafe Hill, Whyteleafe, CR3 0FJ

Planning appeal 3292942 at 2 St Lukes Court, Whyteleafe Hill, Whyteleafe, CR3 0FJ (Tandridge District Council) was dismissed on 24 February 2023 by Inspector Sylvester G, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the host building and area.

the erection of 1 x 2-bed new build flat

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Sylvester G
Postcode
CR3 0FJ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the host building and area

What decided it

The adverse effects on the character and appearance of the host building and area, arising from the unbalancing of the building's coherent hierarchy, significantly and demonstrably outweigh the limited housing and economic benefits of a single additional dwelling.

The adverse effects on character and appearance significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits of housing delivery and the Council's housing land supply shortfall when assessed against the Framework as a whole

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy CSP18 of the Tandridge District Core Strategy (2008)Policy DP7 of the Tandridge District Local Plan Part 2: Detailed Policies 2014-2029Policy CCW4 of the Caterham, Chaldon and Whyteleafe Neighbourhood Plan 2018-2033Policy CCW5 of the Caterham, Chaldon and Whyteleafe Neighbourhood Plan 2018-2033
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 130Paragraph 219

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

151 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Tandridge District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023

  1. Allowed29 October 20266006369
    Land at Thornhill, Westerham Road, Limpsfield, Oxted, RH8 0ED
  2. Dismissed26 October 20266014139
    31a Banstead Road, Caterham, CR3 5QH
  3. Dismissed15 October 20266005184
    Streathbourne House, 75 Redehall Road, Smallfield, RH6 9QA
  4. Dismissed14 October 20266008351
    Development Site West of Southwood, Waller Lane, Caterham, CR3 5EA
  5. Dismissed13 October 20266007518
    Rosemary Cottage, Smallfield Road, Horne, Horley, RH6 9JP

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.