Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed8 February 20233293041

31 Syke Cluan , Richings Park , SL0 9EP

described on the application form as “Proposed new extended porch, double storey side, rear and roof extensions and replacement of the existing garage with a new attached garage

Authority
Buckinghamshire Council - South Bucks Area *
Appeal type
householder · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Ollerenshaw M

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of the neighbouring occupiers of 2 St James Walk with particular regard to outlook and light

What decided it

The proposed two storey rear and side extensions would cause significant harm to the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers at 2 St James Walk through unacceptable overbearing impact and overshadowing, contrary to development plan policies and NPPF paragraph 130.

Framework references: 130

Plan policies cited: EP3, EP5, H11

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.