Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed28 July 20223293484

25 Horton Avenue, Cricklewood, LONDON, NW2 2RY

part single part two storey rear extension

Authority
London Borough of Barnet
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Marshall E

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The impact of the proposal upon the character and appearance of the host dwelling, terraced row and surrounding area
  • The residential amenity of neighbouring occupiers with regard to loss of light and outlook, visual intrusion and overbearingness

What decided it

The proposed roof design presenting as two separate and awkward roof forms with three peaks would appear materially harmful to character and appearance in a visually prominent location, and the extension would result in material loss of light and overbearing impact on neighbouring residential amenity.

Plan policies cited: CS Policy CS5, DMP Policy DM01

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.