Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed28 February 20233293590

Wards Wharf, Royal Docks, Blocks A to C , Wards Wharf Approach , London, E16 2EX

erection of a one storey upwards extension comprising three blocks, atop of the existing Wards Wharf to provide 9 dwellings (C3), inclus ion of associated cycle parking, refuse and recycling storage

Authority
London Borough of Newham
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Pipkin R

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
  • whether or not the proposed development would make adequate provision to ensure fire safety
  • the effect of the proposal on the long-term protection and sustainable operation of nearby industrial uses
  • the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of existing occupants with particular regard to overlooking and outlook
  • whether the proposed development would make adequate provision for waste and recycling facilities
  • whether the proposed development would provide an overall reduction in emissions
  • whether there has been a satisfactory level of community engagement with the existing residents on the site
  • whether the proposed development is in a suitable location

What decided it

The harmful effect on character and appearance combined with insufficient evidence on fire safety, noise mitigation, living conditions, waste provision and emissions reduction, together with inadequate community engagement, significantly and demonstrably outweighed the limited housing benefits.

The modest housing benefit of nine dwellings was significantly and demonstrably outweighed by harmful impacts on character and appearance and unresolved concerns regarding fire safety, industrial use protection, neighbouring living conditions, waste management and emissions reduction, resulting in the proposal not constituting sustainable development under paragraph 11(d)(ii) of the Framework.

Framework references: 11, 120

Plan policies cited: Policy SP1, Policy SP2, Policy SP3, Policy SP4, Policy SP8, Policy S1, Policy S3, Policy INF3, Policy SC1, Policy SC2, Policy D3, Policy D6, Policy D9, Policy D12, Policy D13

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.