Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed28 February 20233293590

Wards Wharf, Royal Docks, Blocks A to C , Wards Wharf Approach , London, E16 2EX

Planning appeal 3293590 at Wards Wharf, Royal Docks, Blocks A to C , Wards Wharf Approach , London, E16 2EX (London Borough of Newham) was dismissed on 28 February 2023 by Inspector Pipkin R, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area.

erection of a one storey upwards extension comprising three blocks, atop of the existing Wards Wharf to provide 9 dwellings (C3), inclus ion of associated cycle parking, refuse and recycling storage

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Pipkin R
Postcode
E16 2EX

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
  • whether or not the proposed development would make adequate provision to ensure fire safety
  • the effect of the proposal on the long-term protection and sustainable operation of nearby industrial uses
  • the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of existing occupants with particular regard to overlooking and outlook
  • whether the proposed development would make adequate provision for waste and recycling facilities
  • whether the proposed development would provide an overall reduction in emissions
  • whether there has been a satisfactory level of community engagement with the existing residents on the site
  • whether the proposed development is in a suitable location

What decided it

The harmful effect on character and appearance combined with insufficient evidence on fire safety, noise mitigation, living conditions, waste provision and emissions reduction, together with inadequate community engagement, significantly and demonstrably outweighed the limited housing benefits.

The modest housing benefit of nine dwellings was significantly and demonstrably outweighed by harmful impacts on character and appearance and unresolved concerns regarding fire safety, industrial use protection, neighbouring living conditions, waste management and emissions reduction, resulting in the proposal not constituting sustainable development under paragraph 11(d)(ii) of the Framework.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy SP1Policy SP2Policy SP3Policy SP4Policy SP8Policy S1Policy S3Policy INF3Policy SC1Policy SC2Policy D3Policy D6Policy D9Policy D12Policy D13
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 120

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

146 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Newham

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023

  1. Dismissed21 October 20266014267
    Rear Of 90 Cumberland Road, Plaistow, London, E13 8LQ
  2. Dismissed2 October 20266011081
    239 Barking Road, London, E6 1LB
  3. Allowed16 September 20266011381
    238 Caulfield Road, East Ham, London, E6 2DQ
  4. Notice varied and upheld10 August 20263362536
    32 Kerrison Road, London, E15 2TH
  5. Notice varied and upheld4 August 20263358326
    42 Disraeli Road, Forest Gate, London, E7 9JP

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.