Planning appeal decision
Fox House, Land R/O 137-167 Hook Road, Surbiton, KT6 5AR
Planning appeal 3293614 at Fox House, Land R/O 137-167 Hook Road, Surbiton, KT6 5AR (Royal Borough of Kingston Upon Thames) was allowed on 18 November 2022 by Inspector Phillips B, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the building has been continuously vacant for 3 months prior to the date of the application for prior approval and meets the requirements of MA.1(a).
the change of use to two residential flats (Use Class C3)
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Change of use
- Inspector
- Phillips B
- Postcode
- KT6 5AR
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the building has been continuously vacant for 3 months prior to the date of the application for prior approval and meets the requirements of MA.1(a)
- the transport impacts of the development
What decided it
The building met the 3-month vacancy requirement and the transport impacts, including parking and highway safety, were acceptable under the GDPO criteria.
The decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Royal Borough of Kingston Upon Thames
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022
- Dismissed7 October 2026601191211 Kingsdowne Road, Surbiton, KT6 6JZ
- Dismissed29 September 2026600998856 Burlington Road, New Malden, KT3 4NU
- Dismissed25 September 2026600907674 - 76 Coombe Road, New Malden, KT3 4QU
- Allowed11 August 20266010924271 Malden Road, New Malden, KT3 6AH
- Dismissed3 August 20266007703Town End Pier, 68 High Street, Kingston Upon Thames, KT1 1HN
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®