Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed31 October 20223293880

Project 1 Building Services Ltd, The Paddock Higher Rads End, Eversholt, Milton Keynes, MK17 9ED

Planning appeal 3293880 at Project 1 Building Services Ltd, The Paddock Higher Rads End, Eversholt, Milton Keynes, MK17 9ED (Central Bedfordshire) was dismissed on 31 October 2022 by Inspector Clarke B, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal represents an inappropriate development in the Green Belt and the effect of the development upon the openness of the Green Belt.

the change of use to builders yard

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
employment-industrial · Minor retail and services
Inspector
Clarke B
Postcode
MK17 9ED

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal represents an inappropriate development in the Green Belt and the effect of the development upon the openness of the Green Belt
  • if the development is inappropriate, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development

What decided it

The proposal would cause inappropriate development and substantial harm to Green Belt openness and character, which is not clearly outweighed by the limited to moderate weight of other considerations.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy SP4Policy SP7Policy HQ1Policy EMP4
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 138Paragraph 148Paragraph 149Paragraph 150

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

24 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Central Bedfordshire

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Dismissed15 September 20266007334
    Hillcrest, Chalton, Luton, LU4 9UB
  2. Allowed4 September 20266007202
    2 Park Farm, Park Road, Westoning, MK45 5LA
  3. Dismissed7 August 20266007254
    Wheatsheaf Barn, Mount Pleasant, Aspley Guise, MK178JZ
  4. Dismissed10 July 20266005439
    263 Sharpenhoe Road, Streatley, LU3 3PP
  5. Dismissed8 July 20266007697
    142 Sharpenhoe Road, Streatley, Luton, LU3 3PS

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.