Planning appeal decision
Little Meadow Bilsham Road, Yapton, Arundel, BN18 0JY
Planning appeal 3293935 at Little Meadow Bilsham Road, Yapton, Arundel, BN18 0JY (Arun District Council) was dismissed on 16 June 2022 by Inspector Jordan A, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would result in unacceptable flood risks, with particular regard to the effects of climate change.
Outline application with access for up to 73 No. new dwellings (but retaining Oak Trees & Little Meadow dwellings), 405 sqm of new light industrial buildings as part of an enlarged employment site & Public Open Space. The existing junction of Grevatts Lane West & Bilsham Road will be closed & Grevatts Lane West diverted to a new access point to the South”
- Authority
- Arun District Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Jordan A
- Postcode
- BN18 0JY
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposal would result in unacceptable flood risks, with particular regard to the effects of climate change
- The effects of the proposal on highway safety
- The accessibility of the site, with particular regard to services and facilities
- The effects of the proposal upon the character and appearance of the area
- Whether the proposal would preserve or enhance heritage assets, in particular Hobbs Farm House, and associated curtilage buildings
- Whether the proposal would lead to an unacceptable loss of agricultural land
- Whether the proposal makes appropriate provision for affordable housing
What decided it
The very substantial harm to the character and appearance of the countryside was not significantly and demonstrably outweighed by the benefits of the scheme, including the provision of housing.
The substantial weight attributed to the provision of up to 73 homes, including affordable housing, and other lesser benefits did not significantly and demonstrably outweigh the very substantial harm to the character and appearance of the countryside, so the tilted balance tipped against the proposal.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- W DM2T SP1T DM1C SP1D SP1D DM1EMP DM1SO DM1AH SP2INF SP1BB1H1E1
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 202
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Arun District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022
- Allowed14 August 20266003625Land West of Brook Lane and South of A259, Angmering, Angmering, BN16 3JL
- Allowed5 August 20266003864HM Ford Open Prison, Ford Road, Ford, BN18 0BX
- Planning permission granted2 March 2026336050527 North Ham Road, Littlehampton, BN17 7AS
- Allowed24 December 20253368245Land to the North of Lake Lane, Barnham, West Sussex, PO22 0AJ
- Notice varied and upheld31 October 202533362221 Sommerset Gardens, Bognor Regis, West Sussex, PO21 2AA
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®