Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed19 August 20223294024

22 Upper Mall, London, W6 9TA

Planning appeal 3294024 at 22 Upper Mall, London, W6 9TA (London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham) was dismissed on 19 August 2022 by Inspector Ellis G, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area having particular regard to heritage assets, The Mall Conservation Area and the setting of Listed Buildings and Buildings of Merit.

the formation of an art studio and conservatory in land at rear of 22 Upper Mall

Authority
London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
other · Householder developments
Inspector
Ellis G
Postcode
W6 9TA

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area having particular regard to heritage assets, The Mall Conservation Area and the setting of Listed Buildings and Buildings of Merit

What decided it

The prominent and incongruous form of the studio building fails to preserve the setting of the group of historic buildings and the character and appearance of the Mall Conservation Area, and this heritage harm is not outweighed by public benefits.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
DC1DC4HC1DC8RTC3AH1AH2CAG3
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 202

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

At least 801 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Allowed27 October 20266010878
    47, Mendora Road, London, SW6 7ND
  2. Dismissed1 October 20266010445
    Pavement Outside 498-504 Fulham Road, London, SW6 5NH
  3. Dismissed1 October 20266010443
    Pavement Outside 498-504 Fulham Road, London, SW6 5NH
  4. Allowed23 September 20266010549
    The Triangle, 5 - 17 Hammersmith Grove, London, W6 0LG
  5. Unknown18 September 20263356900
    Unit 1D, Woodstock Studios, 36 Woodstock Grove, London, W12 8LE

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.