Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed8 November 20223294127

Pinelands Westwood Road, Windlesham, GU20 6LS

Planning appeal 3294127 at Pinelands Westwood Road, Windlesham, GU20 6LS (Surrey Heath Borough Council) was dismissed on 8 November 2022 by Inspector Miles H, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies.

ground and first floor extensions

Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Miles H
Postcode
GU20 6LS

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies
  • The effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • Whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The cumulative effect of the extensions would result in disproportionate additions (close to 200% increase in floorspace) relative to the original building, making the development inappropriate in the Green Belt, with harm to openness and character that was not outweighed by other considerations.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy DM9Policy CP2
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 148Paragraph 149Paragraph 130

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

70 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Surrey Heath Borough Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Dismissed18 September 20266012106
    2 Killy Hill, Chobham, GU24 8RF
  2. Allowed21 May 20266002295
    Land At Snows Ride, Windlesham, Surrey, GU20 6LA
  3. Dismissed1 May 20263376162
    Langshot Equestrian Centre, Gracious Pond Road, Chobham, Woking, GU24 8HJ
  4. Allowed17 April 20263374712
    Newlyn, Highams Lane, Chobham, Surrey, GU24 8TD
  5. Dismissed30 March 20263374826
    Land to the West of 35 Mincing Lane, Chobham, Woking, Surrey, GU24 8RS

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.