Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed14 December 20223294182

Hownsgill Industrial Estate, Consett, Durham, DH8 7EQ

an Energy from Waste Facility. Summary of Recommendation: The appeal be allowed and planning permission be granted subject to the conditions outlined in Annex E. 1. PROCEDURAL AND BACKGROUND MATTERS 1.1 The Inquiry was in respect of an appeal against the refusal of planning permission for an Energy from Waste (EfW) Facility which has been recovered for determination by the Secretary of State by letter dated 26 May 2022. The reason given for the recovery was that the appeal involves proposals giving rise to substantial regional or national controversy. 1.2 A case management conference was held on 20 June 2022 to discuss administrative and

Authority
Durham County Council
Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Inquiry
Development
minerals-waste · Major general industry/storage/warehousing
Inspector
Normington S

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Principle of development on the Hownsgill Industrial Park
  • Waste disposal or recovery?
  • Need for the proposed facility
  • Character and appearance
  • Effect on heritage assets
  • Climate change
  • Effect on economic development
  • Alternative sites and technology
  • Benefits of proposed development

What decided it

The Secretary of State's finding that the proposal would cause very significant landscape and visual harm to the character and quality of the landscape and the Area of Higher Landscape Value, resulting in conflict with Policy 39 and the development plan as a whole, which was not outweighed by the scheme's benefits.

The significant benefits of the waste facility (need and waste hierarchy benefits, energy/catalyst benefits, moderate weight biodiversity net gain and Solar Farm completion, limited weight climate change, EV charging and economic benefits) were outweighed by the very significant harm to landscape character and the AHLV, tipping the balance against the proposal and resulting in dismissal.

Framework references: 56, 57, 154, 155, 174, 176

Plan policies cited: Policy 2, Policy 29, Policy 38, Policy 39, Policy 44, Policy 47, Policy 61, Policy 61(a)

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.