®Planning appeal decision
267, Fulham Palace Road, London, SW6 6TP
erection of a rear roof extension; erection of rear extensions at ground, first and second floor level; alterations to the roof and rear fenestration of ground floor back addition; replacement of existing window with a new window at first floor level to the rear elevation; installation of 4no rooflights in the front roofslope; conversion of the first and second floor level into 1 x 1 bedroom and 1 x 2 bedroom self-contained flats without complying with conditions attached to planning permission Ref 2021/00700/FUL, dated 25 May 2021
- Authority
- London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Other minor developments
- Inspector
- Wilkinson F
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether or not a mechanism to control parking is necessary to protect the area from parking stress and to limit congestion and harm to air quality
- if so, whether or not the disputed conditions provide such a mechanism
What decided it
Conditions 17 and 18 failed to meet the tests for conditions because they restricted individuals rather than the land or building, whereas condition 13 in modified form provides a necessary and appropriate mechanism to secure car parking permit-free measures by linking to the property itself.
Plan policies cited: Policy T4, Policy T1, Policy CC10, Policy HO2, Policy CC3, Policy CC13, Policy T6, Policy T6.1
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.