Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed30 June 20223294404

138 Spackmans Way, Slough, SL1 2SB

Planning appeal 3294404 at 138 Spackmans Way, Slough, SL1 2SB (Slough Borough Council) was dismissed on 30 June 2022 by Inspector Somers J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed development upon the character and appearance of the building and the locality.

a three storey side extension

Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Somers J
Postcode
SL1 2SB

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development upon the character and appearance of the building and the locality
  • The living conditions of existing and future occupiers with regards to the provision of private garden space
  • Whether the vehicular access and parking layout is appropriate for the proposed development, with regards to highway safety
  • Whether Flood Risk Assessment provides sufficient details of escape routes during a flood event and adequately deals with surface water when assessed against the Development Plan policies

What decided it

The proposal would cause significant harm to the character and appearance of the building and locality through excessive visual bulk and massing, would leave inadequate private garden space for future occupiers, and would not provide safe escape routes during a flood event.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Core Strategy Core Policy 9Local Plan for Slough 2004 Saved Policy EN1Local Plan for Slough 2004 Saved Policy H15Local Plan for Slough 2004 Saved Policy H14Local Plan for Slough 2004 Saved Policy EN3Core Strategy Core Policy 7

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

131 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Slough

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Allowed27 October 20266014084
    72 Belfast Avenue, Slough, SL1 3HL
  2. Dismissed8 October 20266011866
    47, Ragstone Road,, Slough,, SL1 2PP
  3. Notice upheld28 September 20263373976
    62 Faraday Road, Slough, SL2 1RU
  4. Notice varied and upheld25 September 20263369048
    Land at 33 Hillside, Slough, SL1 2RW
  5. Allowed25 September 20266010730
    9, Yew Tree Road, Slough, SL1 2AA

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.