Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed9 March 20233294441

Land Rear of 30 Tile Kiln Hill, Blean, Canterbury, Kent, CT2 9EE

Planning appeal 3294441 at Land Rear of 30 Tile Kiln Hill, Blean, Canterbury, Kent, CT2 9EE (Canterbury City Council) was dismissed on 9 March 2023 by Inspector Douglas L, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, with particular regard to the Blean Conservation Area and the locally listed building at the appeal site.

the erection of a one and a half storey self-build dwelling and car port

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Douglas L
Postcode
CT2 9EE

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, with particular regard to the Blean Conservation Area and the locally listed building at the appeal site

What decided it

The uncharacteristic siting, scale and size of the proposed buildings would cause less than substantial harm to the significance of the heritage assets and significant harm to the character and appearance of the area, which was not outweighed by the modest public benefits of the proposal, and the heritage protection policies in the Framework provided a clear reason for refusal notwithstanding the absence of a five-year housing land supply.

The modest public benefits of providing one family-sized dwelling in a sustainable location and the absence of a five-year housing land supply were outweighed by the moderate weight assigned to less than substantial harm to heritage assets and the significant weight assigned to overall harm to character and appearance

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy SP1Policy SP4Policy DBE3Policy HE1Policy HE6Policy HE8
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 56

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

26 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Canterbury City Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023

  1. Dismissed7 November 20253368927
    No. 1 The Bungalow, Canterbury Road, Herne Common, Kent, CT6 7JX
  2. Allowed13 August 20253364379
    14 The Bridge Approach, Whitstable, CT5 1RA
  3. Dismissed6 August 20253360576
    Land South Of Dargate Road, Yorkletts , Kent , CT5 3AH
  4. Dismissed6 August 20253360568
    Land Adjacent To 141 Dargate Road , CT5 3AH, Yorkletts , Kent , CT5 3AH
  5. Dismissed22 April 20253350215
    Land to the West of Golden Hill, , Whitstable, CT5 3AR

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.