Planning appeal decision
106 Sunnybank, Warlingham, CR6 9SS
Planning appeal 3294534 at 106 Sunnybank, Warlingham, CR6 9SS (Tandridge District Council) was dismissed on 14 March 2023 by Inspector Sylvester G, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area.
demolition of outbuildings and residential annexe. Erection of 2 x semi-detached dwellings with associated amenity space, cycle storage, refuse storage, landscaping, and car parking
- Authority
- Tandridge District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Sylvester G
- Postcode
- CR6 9SS
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
- the living conditions of the occupiers of No 106 Sunnybank, with particular regard to privacy
- whether the proposal would provide appropriate living conditions for future occupiers of the proposed dwellings, with particular regard to the amount of outdoor amenity space and sunlight
What decided it
The significantly harmful effects on character and appearance and on the privacy of existing occupiers, combined with modest socio-economic benefits, meant the adverse impacts significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits under paragraph 11(d)(ii) of the Framework.
The modest housing supply and socio-economic benefits were significantly and demonstrably outweighed by the significant harm to character and appearance and to the living conditions of existing occupiers.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy CSP18 of the Tandridge District Core Strategy (2008)Policy DP7 of the Tandridge District Local Plan Part 2: Detailed Policies 2014-2029Policy DP8 of the Tandridge District Local Plan Part 2: Detailed Policies 2014-2029
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 130Paragraph 11
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Tandridge District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023
- Allowed29 October 20266006369Land at Thornhill, Westerham Road, Limpsfield, Oxted, RH8 0ED
- Dismissed26 October 2026601413931a Banstead Road, Caterham, CR3 5QH
- Dismissed15 October 20266005184Streathbourne House, 75 Redehall Road, Smallfield, RH6 9QA
- Dismissed14 October 20266008351Development Site West of Southwood, Waller Lane, Caterham, CR3 5EA
- Dismissed13 October 20266007518Rosemary Cottage, Smallfield Road, Horne, Horley, RH6 9JP
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®