Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed20 June 20223294687

Ground, First and Second Floor of Nos. 164, 166, 168 and 170 High Street, Yiewsley, UB7 7BE

Planning appeal 3294687 at Ground, First and Second Floor of Nos. 164, 166, 168 and 170 High Street, Yiewsley, UB7 7BE (London Borough of Hillingdon) was dismissed on 20 June 2022 by Inspector Baxter C, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effects of the proposal on the living conditions of existing and future occupiers of the appeal building and proposed development with regards to refuse storage, noise and internal space.

single storey upwards extension at second floor level to integrate with the existing house in multiple occupation (HMO) at first floor level to provide an additional 6 bedrooms and communal living/kitchen/dining space with associated external alterations to the building frontage”

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Baxter C
Postcode
UB7 7BE

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effects of the proposal on the living conditions of existing and future occupiers of the appeal building and proposed development with regards to refuse storage, noise and internal space
  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the appeal building and surrounding area
  • Whether the proposal would provide sufficient cycle storage

What decided it

The proposal fails to provide adequate internal floor area and ceiling heights in accordance with London Plan Table 3.1, resulting in an oppressive living environment for future occupiers, and insufficient evidence demonstrates that noise from adjacent commercial uses would not harm living conditions.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
DMHB 11DMHB 16DMH 5D6DMTC1DMHB13DMHB13ADMCI7DMT6D3H9

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

259 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Hillingdon

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Dismissed27 October 20266009856
    18-20 Wilmar Close, Hayes, UB4 8ET
  2. Dismissed18 September 20266011516
    73 High Street, Ruislip, HA4 8JB
  3. Dismissed15 September 20266010520
    Grove Farm, Rickmansworth Road, Harefield, UB9 6JY
  4. Dismissed23 July 20266008246
    21 Green Lane, Hillingdon, Uxbridge, UB8 3ED
  5. Dismissed23 July 20266004329
    14 Willow Tree Lane, Hayes, UB4 9BB

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.