Planning appeal decision
Equestrian Centre, Cherry Lane, Amersham, HP7 0QF
Planning appeal 3294751 at Equestrian Centre, Cherry Lane, Amersham, HP7 0QF (Buckinghamshire Council - Chiltern Area *) was dismissed on 31 October 2022 by Inspector Jackson R, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies.
an agricultural track
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- agricultural · Other minor developments
- Inspector
- Jackson R
- Postcode
- HP7 0QF
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
- the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
- the effect on heritage assets and the settings of heritage assets
- the effect on the character, appearance and scenic beauty of the area being within the Chilterns Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty
- whether there is sufficient information to assess the effect on ecology
- whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The cumulative harm to heritage assets (less than substantial harm to the RPG and Conservation Area), the AONB (significant harm to scenic beauty through tree loss), and unresolved ecological concerns regarding protected species, combined with minimal public benefits, meant the very special circumstances necessary to justify inappropriate Green Belt development did not exist.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy GB2Policy CA1Policy CA2Policy CA5Policy LB2Policy LB5Policy GC12Policy LSQ1Policy NC1Policy CS24
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 147Paragraph 148Paragraph 150Paragraph 174Paragraph 176Paragraph 180Paragraph 199Paragraph 200Paragraph 202Paragraph 219
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Buckinghamshire Council - Chiltern Area
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022
- Dismissed1 April 20263372329118 Chalfont Road, Seer Green, Beaconsfield, HP9 2QP
- Notice varied and upheld12 March 20263325136Fenton Civil Engineering Ltd, Rowan Tree Farm Blackwell Hall Lane, Ley Hill, Chesham, HP5 1UN
- Unknown2 March 20263362050Land at National Society for Epilepsy, Chesham Lane, Chalfont St Peter, Buckinghamshire, HP8 4AD
- Notice upheld2 February 20263332205The Stables Frith Hill, South Heath, Great Missenden, HP16 9QF
- Dismissed23 January 20263372876Parkwood Farm Maltmans Lane, Chalfont St. Peter, Gerrards Cross, SL9 8RP
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®