Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed26 October 20223294772

24 Bloomfield Terrace, LONDON, SW1W 8PQ

a part basement extension, a lower ground floor rear extension, ground floor rear infill extension, and a first floor part width rear extension, replacement windows, rearrangement of the vaults under the front paving and internal refurbishment, as well as external air conditioning units in the rear garden

Authority
City of Westminster Council
Appeal type
householder · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Sargent J

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the works would harm the special architectural and historic interest of this Grade II listed building, whether they would fail to preserve the character or appearance of the Belgravia Conservation Area, and whether they would harm the significance of either of these designated heritage assets

What decided it

The cumulative effect of the proposed extensions would cause less than substantial harm to the significance of the listed building and conservation area, and in the absence of clear and convincing justification or public benefits to outweigh this harm, the proposal conflicts with the development plan and the Framework.

Framework references: 11

Plan policies cited: Policy 45, Policy 38, Policy 39, Policy 40

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.