Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed25 August 20223294919

6-8, Branston Street, Birmingham, West Midlands, B18 6BP

conversion of two vacant workshops to two live work units - resubmission

Authority
Birmingham City Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Wilson L

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on the character of the Jewellery Quarter Conservation Area, having regard to local planning policy
  • Whether the proposed development would provide acceptable living conditions for future occupants, having regard to noise, air quality, privacy and the provision of internal space
  • The effect of the proposed development on the operation of existing businesses

What decided it

The proposal would cause less than substantial but considerable harm to the character of the Conservation Area, would provide unacceptable living conditions for future occupants due to noise, air quality and privacy concerns, and would not integrate effectively with existing businesses, with insufficient public benefits to outweigh these harms.

Framework references: 199, 200, 187

Plan policies cited: Policy 2.2 of the JQCACAMP, Policy 2.4 of the JQCACAMP, Policy GA1.3 of the Birmingham Development Plan (2017), Policy TP12 of the Birmingham Development Plan (2017), Policy PG3 of the Birmingham Development Plan (2017), Policy DM2 of the Council's Development Plan Document, Policy DM6 of the Council's Development Plan Document, Policy DM10 of the Council's Development Plan Document, saved Policy 3.14C of the Birmingham Unitary Development Plan (2005)

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.