Planning appeal decision
6-8, Branston Street, Birmingham, West Midlands, B18 6BP
Planning appeal 3294919 at 6-8, Branston Street, Birmingham, West Midlands, B18 6BP (Birmingham City Council) was dismissed on 25 August 2022 by Inspector Wilson L, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed development on the character of the Jewellery Quarter Conservation Area, having regard to local planning policy.
conversion of two vacant workshops to two live work units - resubmission
- Authority
- Birmingham City Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Change of use
- Inspector
- Wilson L
- Postcode
- B18 6BP
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the proposed development on the character of the Jewellery Quarter Conservation Area, having regard to local planning policy
- Whether the proposed development would provide acceptable living conditions for future occupants, having regard to noise, air quality, privacy and the provision of internal space
- The effect of the proposed development on the operation of existing businesses
What decided it
The proposal would cause less than substantial but considerable harm to the character of the Conservation Area, would provide unacceptable living conditions for future occupants due to noise, air quality and privacy concerns, and would not integrate effectively with existing businesses, with insufficient public benefits to outweigh these harms.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy 2.2 of the JQCACAMPPolicy 2.4 of the JQCACAMPPolicy GA1.3 of the Birmingham Development Plan (2017)Policy TP12 of the Birmingham Development Plan (2017)Policy PG3 of the Birmingham Development Plan (2017)Policy DM2 of the Council's Development Plan DocumentPolicy DM6 of the Council's Development Plan DocumentPolicy DM10 of the Council's Development Plan Documentsaved Policy 3.14C of the Birmingham Unitary Development Plan (2005)
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 199Paragraph 200Paragraph 187
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Birmingham City Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022
- Allowed21 October 20266012934157, Somerford Road, Birmingham, B29 5LB
- Dismissed20 October 20266011877248 Wheelwright Rd, Erdington, Birmingam, B24 8EH
- Allowed6 October 2026600642839 Gladstone Road, Sparkbrook, Birmingham, B11 1LP
- Allowed17 September 20266009473Unit 9a, Bikdale Avenue, Birmingham, B29 6UB
- Dismissed11 September 2026601108812 Sladefield Road, Ward End, Birmingham, B83NX
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®