Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed1 December 20223295210

Land Adj to, 1A Whittle Lane, Birch, Rochdale, 0L10 2RD

described on the application form as ‘1 new bungalow with forecourt, rear terrace, side accesses and drive to garage, new boundary fence and gated vehicle and pedestrian access onto Whittle Lane to replace existing

Authority
Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Ollerenshaw M

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the development plan and the National Planning Policy Framework
  • the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, including whether the proposal would preserve or enhance the character and appearance of the Birch Village Conservation Area
  • whether the proposal would provide satisfactory living conditions for future occupiers, with particular regard to external amenity space
  • if it is inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development

What decided it

The proposal is inappropriate development in the Green Belt causing substantial harm to openness and the character and appearance of a designated heritage asset, with no very special circumstances demonstrated to justify approval.

Framework references: 147, 148, 149, 150, 199, 202

Plan policies cited: Policy G/D/2, Policy G4, Policy P1, Policy P2, Policy P3, Policy DM1

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.