Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed6 September 20223295422

31 The Quadrant, Uppingham, Rutland, LE15 9QP

Planning appeal 3295422 at 31 The Quadrant, Uppingham, Rutland, LE15 9QP (Rutland County Council) was dismissed on 6 September 2022 by Inspector Berry A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of future occupiers.

the construction of single-storey two bedroom dwelling

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Berry A
Postcode
LE15 9QP

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of future occupiers
  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area

What decided it

The substantial harm to the character and appearance of the area and to the living conditions of future occupiers significantly and demonstrably outweighs the limited benefits of providing one additional dwelling in a context of housing land supply shortfall.

The limited benefits of housing delivery and construction employment were outweighed by the substantial harm to character and appearance and the living conditions of future occupiers, such that the adverse impacts significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits when assessed against the NPPF as a whole.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy CS19 of the Rutland Core Strategy 2011Policy SP5 of the Rutland Local Plan Site Allocations and Policies Development Plan Document 2014Policy SP15 of the Rutland Local Plan Site Allocations and Policies Development Plan Document 2014
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 130

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

13 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Rutland

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Dismissed12 October 20266009205
    Land Rear of 25-27 Stapleford Road, Whissendine, LE15 7HF
  2. Allowed12 October 20266007557
    Land North of Wotton Close, Ketton, PE9 3DA
  3. Dismissed30 September 20266010934
    Land off Pickworh Road, Great Casterton, PE9 4AU
  4. Allowed22 September 20266006808
    30 Main Street, Lydington, Oakham, LE15 9LT
  5. Allowed22 September 20266006806
    30 Main Street, Lydington, Oakham, LE15 9LT

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.