Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed27 January 20233295483

Land rear of 8 Church Vale Road, Bexhill, TN40 2ED

erection of a single storey dwelling with associated parking and landscaping

Authority
Rother District Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Hobbs J

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
  • the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of the occupiers of 6 Church Vale Road, with particular regard to outlook, and 2 St Peter's Crescent, with particular regard to outlook and daylight
  • whether the proposed development would provide acceptable living conditions for future occupiers, with regard to the provision of private external space

What decided it

The unacceptable harm to the character and appearance of the area, combined with the overbearing effect on neighbouring living conditions and inadequate private external space for future occupiers, significantly and demonstrably outweighs the benefits of housing delivery in an area with an acknowledged shortfall.

The adverse impacts of the proposed development, comprising harm to character and appearance and harm to living conditions of both neighbouring and future occupiers, significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits of housing delivery, employment during construction, CIL payments, and the provision of an affordable wheelchair-accessible property on previously developed land.

Framework references: 11, 130

Plan policies cited: Policy OSS4, Policy EN3, Policy DEN1, Policy DHG9, Policy DHG7

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.