Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed23 November 20223295646

Osborne Bros, Billet Wharf High Street, Leigh-on-Sea, SS9 2ER

Planning appeal 3295646 at Osborne Bros, Billet Wharf High Street, Leigh-on-Sea, SS9 2ER (Southend-on-Sea City Council) was dismissed on 23 November 2022 by Inspector Grierson E, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposed development would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Conservation Area.

to use public amenity space adjacent seating area to Osborne Bros Café to provide additional external seating area with associated boundary treatment and alterations to pedestrian access

Authority
Southend-on-Sea City Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
leisure-sport · Minor retail and services
Inspector
Grierson E
Postcode
SS9 2ER

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposed development would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Conservation Area
  • the effect of the proposed development on highway safety and public accessibility
  • the effect of the proposed development on the setting and significance of The Crooked Billet Public House

What decided it

The proposed development would fail to preserve or enhance the character and appearance of the Conservation Area and would cause harm to highway safety and public accessibility that could not be justified by the limited economic benefits identified.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy KP2Policy CP4Policy DM1Policy DM3Policy DM5Policy DM6Policy CP3Policy DM15

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

200 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Southend-on-Sea City Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Dismissed29 October 20266013127
    3 Cobham Road,, Westcliff-on-Sea,, SS0 8EG
  2. Dismissed27 October 20266011259
    20 Tattersall Gardens, Leigh on Sea, Southend on Sea, SS92QT
  3. Dismissed2 October 20266009318
    128 Monometer House Rectory Grove, Leigh-on-sea, Southend-on-sea, SS9 2HN
  4. Dismissed2 October 20266009119
    456 Southchurch Rd, Southend, SS1 2QA
  5. Dismissed30 September 20266008855
    Shorefield Cottage 7A, Shorefield Road, Westcliff-on-Sea, SS07RH

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.