Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed28 December 20223295719

18 Agar Close, Surbiton, KT6 7XF

Planning appeal 3295719 at 18 Agar Close, Surbiton, KT6 7XF (Royal Borough of Kingston Upon Thames) was dismissed on 28 December 2022 by Inspector Hills J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal upon the character and appearance of the area.

new 2 bedroom 3 person house

Authority
Royal Borough of Kingston Upon Thames
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Hills J
Postcode
KT6 7XF

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal upon the character and appearance of the area
  • living conditions of the occupiers of 54 Fullers Avenue and 58 Fullers Avenue with particular regard to outlook and privacy
  • highway safety

What decided it

The significant harm to character and appearance, living conditions of neighbours, and highway safety cumulatively outweighed the modest housing supply benefits even under the tilted balance.

The modest economic and social benefits through housing supply contribution and construction employment were significantly and demonstrably outweighed by the conflict with the Framework regarding quality of area, amenity standards, and highway safety.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy D3 of the London Plan 2021Policy CS8 of the LDF Core Strategy Adopted April 2012Policy DM10 of the LDF Core Strategy Adopted April 2012Policy T6 of the London PlanPolicy DM9 of the LDF Core Strategy Adopted April 2012
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 130Paragraph 11

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

363 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Royal Borough of Kingston Upon Thames

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Dismissed7 October 20266011912
    11 Kingsdowne Road, Surbiton, KT6 6JZ
  2. Dismissed29 September 20266009988
    56 Burlington Road, New Malden, KT3 4NU
  3. Dismissed25 September 20266009076
    74 - 76 Coombe Road, New Malden, KT3 4QU
  4. Allowed11 August 20266010924
    271 Malden Road, New Malden, KT3 6AH
  5. Dismissed3 August 20266007703
    Town End Pier, 68 High Street, Kingston Upon Thames, KT1 1HN

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.