Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed23 December 20223295763

Plot 17, Sunset Park Homes, Whitfield, Brackley, NN13 5TD

Planning appeal 3295763 at Plot 17, Sunset Park Homes, Whitfield, Brackley, NN13 5TD (Buckinghamshire Council - Aylesbury Area *) was allowed on 23 December 2022 by Inspector Coffey L, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposed increase in the number of caravans, including any cumulative effects, is acceptable having regard to the location of the site within the countryside and the proximity to services and facilities in the surrounding area.

Retention of 4no. Static Caravans

Appeal type
other · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Inquiry
Development
caravan-gypsy · Unknown
Inspector
Coffey L
Postcode
NN13 5TD

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposed increase in the number of caravans, including any cumulative effects, is acceptable having regard to the location of the site within the countryside and the proximity to services and facilities in the surrounding area.
  • The effect of the proposals, including any cumulative effects, on the character and appearance of the surrounding countryside.
  • Whether the proposed site would provide suitable living conditions for future occupants with particular regard to amenity space and privacy.
  • Whether in the absence of any provision for touring caravans the proposed site would be suitable for Gypsies and Travellers.
  • The need for and supply of Gypsy and Traveller sites within Buckinghamshire, including whether there is a five year supply of Gypsy and Traveller sites.
  • The availability of alternative sites.
  • The accommodation needs and personal circumstances of the appellants.
  • The Gypsy and Traveller status of the occupants of the site.

What decided it

The Inspector's conclusion that the proposals, taken against each main issue, complied with the development plan as a whole, including because the Council could not demonstrate a five year supply of Gypsy and Traveller pitches and there was a pressing need for sites.

The benefits of reasonable access to services, acceptable living conditions, and meeting a pressing and urgent need for Gypsy and Traveller pitches outweighed the limited, localised harm to countryside character (mitigable by landscaping) and the limited weight attributed to the intentional unauthorised development, resulting in overall accordance with the development plan.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy S6Policy D11Policy S2Policy S3Policy NE4Policy S1Policy S7Policy D-AGT2
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11
Judgments
Lisa Smith -v- The Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government and Others [2021] EWHC 1650 (Admin)

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

27 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Buckinghamshire Council - Aylesbury Area

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Notice upheld30 September 20263370104
    New Bengal Blue, 17-19 Walton Road, Aylesbury, Buckinghamshire, HP21 7SR
  2. Notice upheld18 September 20263354830
    Una's Newsagency, 5 Buckingham Street, Aylesbury, HP20 2LA
  3. Split Decision20 August 20263376196
    Berryfields Mda, Bicester Road, Quarrendon, Bucks, MK3 5SD
  4. Unknown1 July 20263376431
    Littleton Manor Farm, Bicester Road, North-west of Waddesdon, Buckinghamshire, HP18 0JR
  5. Dismissed20 May 20263375483
    Land Adjacent to Warren House, Warren Road, Little Horwood, Buckinghamshire, MK17 0PT

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.