Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed20 September 20223295916

109 Mortlake High Street, London, SW14 8HQ

Planning appeal 3295916 at 109 Mortlake High Street, London, SW14 8HQ (Richmond Upon Thames London Borough Council) was allowed on 20 September 2022 by Inspector Down K, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed three storey rear extension on the character and appearance of the host building, the adjoining terrace and the surrounding area, including the Mortlake Conservation Area.

demolition of a rear lower ground floor extension and construction of a part three, part single storey rear extension with 2 x dormer roof extensions to the rear. Roof-lights to the front roof, new staircase access to front light- well. Removal and replacement of existing uPVC windows with new timber sash windows to match

Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Down K
Postcode
SW14 8HQ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed three storey rear extension on the character and appearance of the host building, the adjoining terrace and the surrounding area, including the Mortlake Conservation Area.

What decided it

The proposed three storey rear extension, owing to its sympathetic design, subservient scale and inconspicuous siting against the adjacent taller flatted development, would have no materially harmful effect on the character and appearance of the host building, terrace or surrounding area and would preserve the significance of the Mortlake Conservation Area.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy LP3Policy LP1Policy LP4

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

364 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Richmond upon Thames

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Allowed16 February 20266000325
    18 Wellington Rd, Hampton, Richmond Upon Thames, TW12 1JT
  2. Allowed10 February 20266000436
    265 Waldegrave Road, Twickenham, TW1 4SU
  3. Dismissed6 February 20266000389
    The Coach House, Vicarage Road, Teddington, TW11 8EZ
  4. Allowed27 January 20266001465
    The Boathouse, Ranelagh Drive, Twickenham, TW1 1QZ
  5. Dismissed29 December 20253358041
    Grosvenor Garage , Fitzgerald Avenue, East Sheen , London , SW14 8SZ

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.