Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed7 December 20223296195

Weston, Beckermet, Egremont, CA22 2NX

Planning appeal 3296195 at Weston, Beckermet, Egremont, CA22 2NX (Copeland Borough Council *) was dismissed on 7 December 2022 by Inspector Harrison F, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would provide a suitable location for housing, having regard to the accessibility of services and facilities.

outline planning permission for redevelopment of builders yard to residential

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Harrison F
Postcode
CA22 2NX

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would provide a suitable location for housing, having regard to the accessibility of services and facilities

What decided it

The proposal would not provide a suitable location for housing due to poor accessibility of services and facilities, conflicting with policies ST1, ST2 and SS3 of the Local Plan which are consistent with the Framework, and the Council can demonstrate a 5-year housing land supply, so the tilted balance does not apply.

The significant weight afforded to the conflict with development plan policies on accessibility and sustainability outweighed the limited benefits of brownfield redevelopment, additional dwellings, and economic benefits, resulting in dismissal.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy ST1Policy ST2Policy SS3
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 48Paragraph 80Paragraph 79Paragraph 105Paragraph 92Paragraph 11Paragraph 219
Judgments
Braintree District Council v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government & Ors [2017] EWHC 2743 (Admin)

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

No other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Copeland Borough Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Allowed4 April 20243323242
    Spout House, Sandwith, Cumbria, CA28 9UG
  2. Allowed19 January 20243311413
    Land at Tarn Bank, Braystones, Beckermet, Cumbria, CA21 2YL
  3. Allowed18 October 20233304774
    Land to the North of Station Road, Drigg, Holmrook, CA19 1XQ
  4. Allowed18 August 20233316104
    Land at Harras Moor, Whitehaven
  5. Allowed18 August 20233314416
    Beckside Farm, Distington, CA14 4QY

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.