Planning appeal decision
Beechfield, Moats Lane, South Nutfield, Redhill, RH1 5PF
Planning appeal 3296204 at Beechfield, Moats Lane, South Nutfield, Redhill, RH1 5PF (Tandridge District Council) was allowed on 17 October 2022 by Inspector McGlone A, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal is inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework (the Framework) and any relevant development plan policies.
the use of land as a private gypsy and traveller caravan site consisting of 2 pitches
- Authority
- Tandridge District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- caravan-gypsy · Minor traveller and caravan pitches
- Inspector
- McGlone A
- Postcode
- RH1 5PF
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal is inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework (the Framework) and any relevant development plan policies
- the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
- the effect of the proposal on the purposes of including the land within the Green Belt
- the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
- if the development is inappropriate, would the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The lack of any alternative accommodation for the intended occupants, particularly Miss Reading and her young child, combined with the absence of a five-year supply of traveller pitches, was sufficient to justify very special circumstances for a temporary, but not permanent, grant of planning permission.
The substantial harm from inappropriateness, moderate loss of openness and limited harm to Green Belt purposes were, on balance, not clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to justify a permanent permission, but the unmet need for pitches, absence of alternative sites and personal/family circumstances did clearly outweigh the Green Belt harm to justify a temporary permission until the end of 2025.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy DP10Policy DP7Policy CSP 9Policy CSP 18
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Tandridge District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022
- Allowed29 October 20266006369Land at Thornhill, Westerham Road, Limpsfield, Oxted, RH8 0ED
- Dismissed14 October 20266008351Development Site West of Southwood, Waller Lane, Caterham, CR3 5EA
- Dismissed13 October 20266007518Rosemary Cottage, Smallfield Road, Horne, Horley, RH6 9JP
- Dismissed23 September 20266008688Land Adjacent to Farm View Cottage, Lingfield Road, East Grinstead, RH19 2JW
- Dismissed22 September 20266011736Land Adjacent to Oaklands Drive, Copthorne Bank, Copthorne, RH10 3JD
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®