Planning appeal decision
Bybrook Meadow, Ashley , Box, Wiltshire
Planning appeal 3296262 at Bybrook Meadow, Ashley , Box, Wiltshire (Wiltshire Council) was dismissed on 6 October 2022 by Inspector Cuthbert L, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal is inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to relevant development plan and national planning policies, taking into account the effect on the openness of the Green Belt and the purposes of including land within it.
Change of use and conversion of agricultural building to a single dwelling with associated development, including installation of a septic tank
- Authority
- Wiltshire Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Change of use
- Inspector
- Cuthbert L
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposal is inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to relevant development plan and national planning policies, taking into account the effect on the openness of the Green Belt and the purposes of including land within it
- Whether the proposed development would conserve or enhance the natural beauty of the landscape within the Cotswolds Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty
- Whether the location of the proposed development is acceptable, having regard to the accessibility of services and facilities
- If the development is inappropriate, would the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The harm to the openness of the Green Belt, conflict with the purposes of the Green Belt, harm to the Cotswolds AONB, and unsuitability of the location for residential development were not clearly outweighed by other considerations, and very special circumstances did not exist to justify the development.
The moderate weight afforded to the re-use of a disused building and limited weight to other material considerations did not clearly outweigh the substantial harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness, the erosion of openness, conflict with Green Belt purposes, harm to the AONB, and unsuitability of location, resulting in dismissal of the appeal.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Core Policy 1Core Policy 2Core Policy 48Core Policy 51Core Policy 60Core Policy 61
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 80Paragraph 84Paragraph 110Paragraph 137Paragraph 138Paragraph 148Paragraph 149Paragraph 150Paragraph 176Paragraph 219
- Judgments
- Bernard Wheatcroft Ltd v SSE 1982
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Wiltshire
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022
- Dismissed21 October 20266009225Land at Elms Farm, Elms Cross, BA15 2AL
- Dismissed11 June 20266003438Land South of 214B Corsham Road, Whitley, Melksham, SN12 8QF
- Allowed8 January 20263365948Heleigh Cottage, Bath Road, Middle Hill, Box, Corsham, Wiltshire, SN13 8QB
- Dismissed19 June 202533602035 The Tynings, Box Hill, Corsham, SN13 8HQ
- Dismissed5 July 202433245502 Warminster Road, Monkton Combe, Bath, Wiltshire , BA2 7HZ
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®