Planning appeal decision
Bybrook Meadow, Ashley , Box, Wiltshire
Change of use and conversion of agricultural building to a single dwelling with associated development, including installation of a septic tank
- Authority
- Wiltshire Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Change of use
- Inspector
- Cuthbert L
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposal is inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to relevant development plan and national planning policies, taking into account the effect on the openness of the Green Belt and the purposes of including land within it
- Whether the proposed development would conserve or enhance the natural beauty of the landscape within the Cotswolds Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty
- Whether the location of the proposed development is acceptable, having regard to the accessibility of services and facilities
- If the development is inappropriate, would the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The harm to the openness of the Green Belt, conflict with the purposes of the Green Belt, harm to the Cotswolds AONB, and unsuitability of the location for residential development were not clearly outweighed by other considerations, and very special circumstances did not exist to justify the development.
The moderate weight afforded to the re-use of a disused building and limited weight to other material considerations did not clearly outweigh the substantial harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness, the erosion of openness, conflict with Green Belt purposes, harm to the AONB, and unsuitability of location, resulting in dismissal of the appeal.
Framework references: 11, 80, 84, 110, 137, 138, 148, 149, 150, 176, 219
Plan policies cited: Core Policy 1, Core Policy 2, Core Policy 48, Core Policy 51, Core Policy 60, Core Policy 61
Judgments cited: Bernard Wheatcroft Ltd v SSE 1982
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®