Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed14 December 20223296357

Finsbury Court, Parkside, Waltham Cross, EN8 7TH

described on the Council’s

Authority
Broxbourne Borough Council
Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Hearing
Development
residential · Major dwellings
Inspector
Bristow T

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether or not the proposal would make appropriate provision for parking
  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • whether or not the proposal would contribute appropriately towards infrastructure provision

What decided it

The Inspector's conclusion that the scheme complied with the development plan on parking and character/appearance and that the disputed financial contributions failed the necessity/relatedness tests, leaving no planning objection to the grant of permission.

Framework references: 11, 34, 55, 56, 57, 58, 68, 74, 104, 105, 130, 174, 180

Plan policies cited: Policy TM5, Policy DSC1, Policy INF1, Policy PO1, Policy NEB1, Policy NEB3, Policy NEB4, Policy TM4

Judgments cited: Aberdeen City and Shire Strategic Development Planning Authority v Elsick Development Company Limited (Scotland) [2017] UKSC 66

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.