Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed12 October 20266008417

Land to the Rear of 21 to 32 Doverfield, Goffs Oak, Waltham Cross, EN7 5EL

Planning appeal 6008417 at Land to the Rear of 21 to 32 Doverfield, Goffs Oak, Waltham Cross, EN7 5EL (Broxbourne) was allowed on 12 October 2026, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would be inappropriate in terms of green belt policy.

the erection of 5 no. four-bedroom dwellings, with access drives, parking and boundary gates and fences

Authority
Broxbourne
Appeal type
minor · Planning
Procedure
Written
Development
residential
Postcode
EN7 5EL

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would be inappropriate in terms of green belt policy
  • the effects on on-street car parking in Doverfield

What decided it

The appeal site met all the relevant criteria of NPPF Policy GB7-1g as grey belt land, so the development was not inappropriate in green belt terms, and the resulting minor parking harm did not outweigh the benefits of the scheme.

the multiple benefits of the scheme (addressing the district's proven housing land need, enhanced pedestrian connectivity, economic benefits, and biodiversity net gain) clearly outweigh the minor harm in relation to parking

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy GB1Policy TM2
National Planning Policy Framework
Policy GB6Policy GB7Policy TR3
Judgments
Vistry Homes Ltd v Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities; Fairfax Acquisitions Ltd v Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities [2024] EWHC 2088 (Admin)

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

91 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Broxbourne

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Allowed13 October 20266004350
    Playing Field Behind 1-41 Goffs Lane and 113-159 Churchgate, Cheshunt, EN7 5EG
  2. Allowed16 June 20266003023
    Land off Newgatestreet Road and Hammondstreet Road, Laurel Park, Broxbourne, EN7 6PH
  3. Allowed10 June 20266003616
    Land at Goffs Oak Gospel Hall, East of Newgatestreet Road, Goffs Oak, EN7 5RU
  4. Notice varied and upheld20 March 20263357949
    14 Gaywood Avenue, Cheshunt, Waltham Cross, EN8 8QD
  5. Allowed19 February 20263374697
    45 Turners Hill, Cheshunt, Hertfordshire, EN8 8NJ

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.