Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed19 August 20223296695

46 Walsh Drive, SUTTON COLDFIELD, B76 2NU

for the erection of a two storey rear and single storey front, side and rear extensions and garage conversion with alterations to the front

Authority
Birmingham City Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Bennett T

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of the occupiers of the neighbouring properties with particular regard to privacy (25 and 27 Tysoe Drive), and outlook and light (48 Walsh Drive)

What decided it

The two-storey rear extension would cause unacceptable harm to the privacy of occupiers at 25 and 27 Tysoe Drive and the outlook of occupiers at 48 Walsh Drive, conflicting with development plan policies requiring protection of residential amenity.

Plan policies cited: Policy DM2, Policy DM10, Policy PG3, Policy TP27

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.