Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed10 October 20223297030

Unit 1 Bank Mill , Manchester Road, Mossley, OL5 9BB

Planning appeal 3297030 at Unit 1 Bank Mill , Manchester Road, Mossley, OL5 9BB (Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council) was dismissed on 10 October 2022 by Inspector Moulton E, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the host building and the area.

the conversion of business/storage unit into two dwellings

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Moulton E
Postcode
OL5 9BB

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the host building and the area
  • whether appropriate living conditions would be provided for future occupiers of the proposal with particular regard to outlook, privacy, noise and disturbance
  • the effect of the proposal on the operation of the nearby businesses

What decided it

The identified harms to character and appearance, living conditions of future occupiers, and the operation of nearby businesses significantly and demonstrably outweigh the modest housing benefits, even under the tilted balance.

The modest contribution of two housing units and small economic benefits were significantly and demonstrably outweighed by the unacceptable harm to character and appearance, inadequate living conditions for future occupiers, and unacceptable effects on the operation of nearby businesses.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy C1Policy H10Policy 1.12
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

47 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Dismissed29 October 20266012606
    50-54 Grosvenor Street, Stalybridge, SK15 1RR
  2. Dismissed2 October 20266010069
    2, Ridge Hill Lane, Tameside, SK15 1NF
  3. Dismissed7 September 20266006049
    308 Stockport Road, Hyde, SK14 5RU
  4. Dismissed1 April 20266002816
    Junction Inn, Mossley Road, Ashton-under-lyne, OL6 9BX
  5. Allowed2 September 20253366323
    232 Oldham Road, Ashton-under-Lyne, Greater Manchester, OL7 9AP

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.