Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice upheld6 January 20233297137

14 Court Parade, East Lane, Wembley, HA0 3HU

without planning permission, the erection of a canopy extension/covered area backing on to the rear extension (“the unauthorised development”)

Authority
London Borough of Brent
Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
other · Householder developments
Inspector
Griffin E

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the development preserves or enhances the character or appearance of the Sudbury Court Conservation Area

What decided it

The poor quality design and use of inappropriate materials in a prominent location within the Conservation Area caused less than substantial but considerable harm to its character and appearance, which was not outweighed by the limited public benefits advanced.

Framework references: 199, 200, 202

Plan policies cited: Policy BHC1, Policy DMP1, Policy BD1

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.