Planning appeal decision
14 Court Parade, East Lane, Wembley, HA0 3HU
without planning permission, the erection of a canopy extension/covered area backing on to the rear extension (“the unauthorised development”)
- Authority
- London Borough of Brent
- Appeal type
- enforcement · Enforcement Notice
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- other · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Griffin E
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the development preserves or enhances the character or appearance of the Sudbury Court Conservation Area
What decided it
The poor quality design and use of inappropriate materials in a prominent location within the Conservation Area caused less than substantial but considerable harm to its character and appearance, which was not outweighed by the limited public benefits advanced.
Framework references: 199, 200, 202
Plan policies cited: Policy BHC1, Policy DMP1, Policy BD1
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®