Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed1 September 20223297314

165 Osbaldeston Road, Hackney, London, N16 6ND

Planning appeal 3297314 at 165 Osbaldeston Road, Hackney, London, N16 6ND (London Borough of Hackney) was dismissed on 1 September 2022 by Inspector Marshall E, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The impact of the proposal upon the character and appearance of the host building and Northwold and Cazenove Conservation Area.

erection of a hip to gable roof extension, a rear roof dormer extension, excavation of basement and formation of a rear lightwell, erection of a two storey rear extension at basement and ground floor

Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Marshall E
Postcode
N16 6ND

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The impact of the proposal upon the character and appearance of the host building and Northwold and Cazenove Conservation Area
  • The residential amenity of neighbouring occupiers at 163 Osbaldeston Road with regard to loss of light, increased sense of enclosure and overbearing impact

What decided it

The proposal would result in less than substantial harm to the conservation area through visually incongruous roof alterations and an oversized rear extension contrary to local design guidance, with no public benefits to outweigh the harm and unacceptable impacts on neighbouring residential amenity.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Hackney Local Plan 2020 Policy LP1Hackney Local Plan 2020 Policy LP3London Plan 2021 Policy D3London Plan 2021 Policy D6Hackney Local Plan 2020 Policy LP2
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 199Paragraph 202Paragraph 134

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

765 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Hackney

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Dismissed2 October 20266007927
    47 Burma Road, Hackney, N16 9BH
  2. Dismissed1 October 20266010033
    259 Wick Road, Hackney, London, E9 5DG
  3. Dismissed30 September 20266010111
    Flat B, 83 Rectory Road, Hackney, N16 7PP
  4. Dismissed30 September 20266010110
    Flat B, 83 Rectory Road, Hackney, N16 7PP
  5. Dismissed25 September 20266012204
    42 Cranwich Road, Hackney, N16 5JN

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.