Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed28 February 20233297516

Woodlands , Beacon Hill, PENN, HP10 8NH

Proposed two storey front extension, infill roof extension fenestration alterations (alternative scheme to PL19-3530-VRC)

Authority
Buckinghamshire Council - South Bucks Area *
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Plenty B

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposed extension would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
  • The effect on the openness of the Green Belt
  • The effect on the character and appearance of the area, including the Chilterns Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB)
  • If the proposal would be inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to very special circumstances to justify it

What decided it

The cumulative effect of the proposed extensions, combined with previous additions, would constitute disproportionate additions to the original dwelling that would harm the Green Belt's openness and the character and appearance of the AONB, with no very special circumstances to justify the inappropriate development.

Framework references: 137, 147, 148, 149

Plan policies cited: GB2, GB13, GC1, H18, LSQ1, CS20, CS22

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.