Planning appeal decision
18 & 20 St. Peters Road, Hammersmith, London, W6 9BD
Planning appeal 3297518 at 18 & 20 St. Peters Road, Hammersmith, London, W6 9BD (London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham) was dismissed on 11 August 2022 by Inspector Ellis G, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the development on the host building and the character and appearance of the area, including the St Peter's Square Conservation Area.
the erection of rear roof extensions including the formation of hip to gable roof extensions, installation of 2no rooflights in the front roofslopes, and installation of 2no windows following the removal of 1no window to the side elevations of both properties at no. 18 and 20 St Peter's Road; replacement of 3no windows to the front elevation and 1no window to the rear elevation of no. 18 St Peter's Road with new windows
- Appeal type
- householder · Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Ellis G
- Postcode
- W6 9BD
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the development on the host building and the character and appearance of the area, including the St Peter's Square Conservation Area
What decided it
The scale and form of the proposed roof extensions would have a harmful impact on the character and appearance of the St Peter's Square Conservation Area, and the private benefits to the occupiers did not outweigh the conservation harm that must be given great weight under the Framework.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- DC1DC4DC8CAG2CAG3
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 199Paragraph 201Paragraph 202
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022
- Allowed27 October 2026601087847, Mendora Road, London, SW6 7ND
- Dismissed1 October 20266010445Pavement Outside 498-504 Fulham Road, London, SW6 5NH
- Dismissed1 October 20266010443Pavement Outside 498-504 Fulham Road, London, SW6 5NH
- Allowed23 September 20266010549The Triangle, 5 - 17 Hammersmith Grove, London, W6 0LG
- Unknown18 September 20263356900Unit 1D, Woodstock Studios, 36 Woodstock Grove, London, W12 8LE
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®