Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed15 November 20223297537

Land at Cross Lane, Woodsetts, S81 8SP

the erection of a private stable block and retain hard standing as original

Authority
Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
agricultural · Other minor developments
Inspector
Radcliffe I

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal is inappropriate development for the purposes of development plan policy and the National Planning Policy Framework
  • the effect of the proposal on Cross Lane Meadow Local Wildlife Site
  • if the development is inappropriate, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to very special circumstances necessary to justify the development

What decided it

The hardstanding constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt that fails to preserve openness, and combined with harm to the Local Wildlife Site, no very special circumstances exist to justify the development.

Framework references: 148, 149, 150

Plan policies cited: Policy CS4, Policy CS20, Policy SP10, Policy SP33, Policy SP34

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.