Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed16 February 20233297588

5 Frobisher Yard, London, E16 2GY

Planning appeal 3297588 at 5 Frobisher Yard, London, E16 2GY (London Borough of Newham) was dismissed on 16 February 2023 by Inspector Marigold O, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on the character of the area, in particular the mix, balance and cohesion of the community.

change of use from existing C3 Dwelling house to C4 Small House in Multiple Occupation

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Marigold O
Postcode
E16 2GY

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on the character of the area, in particular the mix, balance and cohesion of the community
  • whether adequate living conditions for occupiers of the proposal would be provided, in respect of outdoor space and escape in the event of a fire
  • the effect of the proposal on the living conditions of the occupiers of nearby properties

What decided it

The proposal would conflict with the Development Plan as a whole by undermining the Council's strategy to protect family housing and increase its supply, while also failing to provide adequate living conditions for future occupiers and causing harm to neighbouring residents.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy H4Policy H3Policy H1Policy S1Policy S6Policy SP1Policy SP2Policy SP3Policy S3London Plan Policy GG4London Plan Policy H10London Plan Policy H8London Plan Policy D4London Plan Policy D6London Plan Policy D12London Plan Policy GG1London Plan Policy GG3London Plan Policy D3London Plan Policy D14Policy SP8Policy S2

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

90 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Newham

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023

  1. Dismissed21 October 20266014267
    Rear Of 90 Cumberland Road, Plaistow, London, E13 8LQ
  2. Dismissed2 October 20266011081
    239 Barking Road, London, E6 1LB
  3. Allowed16 September 20266011381
    238 Caulfield Road, East Ham, London, E6 2DQ
  4. Notice varied and upheld10 August 20263362536
    32 Kerrison Road, London, E15 2TH
  5. Notice varied and upheld4 August 20263358326
    42 Disraeli Road, Forest Gate, London, E7 9JP

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.